[Erik Latranyi]

While Martin’s background may explain his violent behavior, it is irrelevant here.

We know that, at the moment of the shooting, Martin was attacking Zimmerman (on top of him) to the point where Zimmerman defended himself with his firearm.

At this point, the only thread liberals can hope for is to say Zimmerman physically attacked Martin first, who defended himself, and then Zimmerman shot Martin when he was losing the fight.

And that lies in the realm of no witnesses, no evidence and only Zimmerman’s word.

Which is why liberals will never give this up.

[Arrowhead1952]

**And that lies in the realm of no witnesses, no evidence and only Zimmerman’s word.**

---

Skip the first few threads and there are several threads about a witness whose account matches the injuries Zimmerman had.

---

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;q=quick;s=witness