As convention nears, balance security and free speech "This summer's Republican National Convention will put Tampa in the spotlight like never before. And that attention brings an added responsibility on the city to protect the civil liberties of protesters and the public even amid unprecedented security. The city needs to be thoughtful and accommodating as it looks to change local laws that govern when and how demonstrators and other groups may gather.
Many security arrangements will be dictated by the U.S. Secret Service, including the broader restrictions in and around the main activity areas at the Tampa Bay Times Forum and the Tampa Convention Center. But the city still has its own area of authority and an obligation to make its views known when security concerns begin to infringe on the public's right to assemble and express protected speech.
Tampa Mayor Bob Buckhorn's administration has spent several months looking at ways to relax the permitting code to make it easier for large groups to gather without breaking the law.....
...The existing codes make some exceptions for public protests, but those guarantees are few and too much discretion is left to top city officials. That is a recipe for abuse and for costly legal battles. The city should at the least focus on loosening the most onerous rules, such as those requiring long lead times for protesters to apply for permits. Others, such as those requiring multimillion-dollar insurance guarantees and hefty up-front costs for security, cleanup and other incidentals, need to be modified to reflect the fluid nature of accommodating the public at what will already be a high-security event. The goal should be to balance free speech and security. That will require common sense in drafting the new permitting codes.".....
Never made the connection. Shame on me. Good find.
Your post demands a thread all its own.
“Tampa Mayor Bob Buckhorn’s administration has spent several months looking at ways to relax the permitting code to make it easier for large groups to gather without breaking the law.....”
Think of it. A contested convention is itself the ultimate exercise of the public’s right to freedom of assembly and free speech. Yet, according to the post, the city government id trying to make it easier for large groups to gather to disrupt the peacable assembly and speech of the delegated representatives of the people of the entire nation?