To: Kaslin
I read an article yesterday that said the justices have probably all already made up their mind how they are going to vote. These oral arguments are just for going through the process. I think its probably true. This is not rocket science. I’m looking for at least the individual mandate to be thrown out 5-4. They will probably leave the rest of it for congress to dismantle as they see fit.
8 posted on
03/27/2012 6:08:28 AM PDT by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: Georgia Girl 2
I think your right, but I am not sure. Striking the mandate down will open up an interesting can of worms.
31 posted on
03/27/2012 10:21:56 AM PDT by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: Georgia Girl 2
Well, lets hope so. The individual mandate is crucial for funding reasons. Without it, the rest of the scheme can't be paid for without drastic politically suicidal measures. I have read too that the justices will have had their research done by now, and in oral argument they seek only to help clarify and write their opinions.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson