A tweet??? Oh, okay ... LOL
From his brother.
Read the tweet history of the poor little innocent thug wanna-be.
Unguarded posts/tweets reflect the soul of the thug, and his tweets show you he had a dark soul and was a remarkable narcissist and misogynist.
I posted a reply to your request for a link. That’s what people do, provide links.
You chose to mock the source but did not challenge the veracity of his own brothers tweet. So, either the brother is lying or the thug lied about assaulting a bus driver.
In either case, the credibility of the thug or his brother is in question. Who to believe? Either his brother was making up a tweet about assaulting a bus driver or the thug was making up a lie about assaulting a bus driver and his brother bought into the lie. Someone is lying, either the thug or his brother.
Now you have a choice, since you are not going to change my mind (facts will), and I will not change your mind. . .so we are left with this last choice of yours—reply to this post in a lame attempt to enter into a pointless argument or do the adult thing and let it go. . .accepting the fact we disagree.
I’m betting you don’t do the adult thing but instead go the immature route and provide a snarky reply. I’m betting I’m right about you.
Prove me wrong.
I just wanted you to know, Alice, that this is the post which negated your entire case. Last night I was following this thread, and I found your comments interesting. You appeared to be providing relevant information, and I made the mistake of thinking you might be objective, trustworthy and/or just very well informed.
Then you challenged the assertion that Trayvon had attacked a bus driver. Your request for a link was provided. At that point you had a choice: admit Trayvon did indeed have violence in his past, or go full on Saul Alinsky and mock the info and its provider.
As soon as you chose B, I revised my opinion of you and all your info. Turns out you're so biased, you could pass for Trayvon’s mother. Iow, a reliable source of info you Are Not.
What on earth kind of question is, ‘A tweet?’ What century do you live in, that you don't know what a tweet is??? Or if you know, what possessed you to be so smart...alecky about it? Yes, of course ‘a tweet’. It's how people of Trayvon’s age communicate, duh. He tweeted to his brother, evidently re: his suspension, and his brother tweeted back. It's obvious from the latter that Trayvon attacked his bus driver.
If you can't or won't see that, then why pretend you're anything but neck deep in Trayvon’s Kool Aid? Iow, if your narrative is, ‘Trayvon is the innocent victim and Zimmermman is evil’, and you ignore and dismiss any fact--yes, fact—that interferes w your narrative, your credibility is exactly zero.
If you're smart, you'll take my comments to heart. The next time you're trying to make a factual case, be more respectful of info that contradicts your narrative. If your only tool is mockery, you will lose any and all objective observers who, like myself, had previously vested you w integrity.
Fwiw.