Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reese Hamm
"It could be argued that a kid raised in the "stranger danger" era might feel threatened by someone following him."

It could be argued (easily) that you, like Santorum, are a real threat and danger to truth and basic common sense.

Why, by ANY two-brain-cell reasoning, would ANYONE who feels impending acute immediate personal danger or threat--of ANY degree--instead of swiftly taking ANY of a number of other freely-open pathways AWAY from it--turn back TOWARD the "danger/threat" and TACKLE and PUMMEL INTO CONCRETE WITHOUT RELENT the retreated "scary and dangerous" adult male who supposedly caused the "stranger danger kid" to to be so SCARED CR@PLESS?

You and your laughable logic are an embarrassment to basic common sense, rational thought, and halfway intelligent reasoning.

247 posted on 03/27/2012 10:36:58 AM PDT by Miss Behave (All ways, always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Behave
Who said scared crapless? I said felt threatened which is all the Florida statute requires.

It could be that Martin told himself that he was being a wuss to run away and mustered up the bravo to ask Zimmerman why he was following him AND THEN panicked anew when, thinking Zimmerman was going a weapon, punched Zimmerman who was merely reaching for his phone as he stated he was doing when Martin clocked him.

Hell, the saddest part of this whole situation is that it is entirely possible for it to be a complete and utter tragedy without either party being the "bad guy."

248 posted on 03/27/2012 11:02:54 AM PDT by Reese Hamm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson