Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scotswife
I’ve never said that I know what happened in the final altercation

According to published police records, Zimmerman lost the kid. He had no idea where the kid went....until said kid attacked him near his vehicle, got him to the ground and was beating him (as per on the record witness).

If the kid had lost Zimmerman, why not stay away and go home?

I repeat, it's not illegal to follow someone that is out of place in your neighborhood. It is illegal to attack someone when imminent threat to your safety is eliminated (meaning the kid had lost the guy, why go after him and beat him up?)

157 posted on 03/26/2012 6:14:04 AM PDT by CAluvdubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: CAluvdubya

“If the kid had lost Zimmerman, why not stay away and go home?”

True...Martin should have listened to his girlfriend. If he had, he’d be alive today.

“I repeat, it’s not illegal to follow someone that is out of place in your neighborhood.”

Well that’s just it isn’t it?
It may not be illegal, but it’s certainly not very smart.
Neighborhood watch does not tell their members to follow.
The dispatcher did not want him to follow.

Following someone can, in itself, frighten someone.
And then you have to define “out of place”

So Martin was visiting his father’s girlfriend’s house. He wasn’t “out of place” - he was a guest.
But, in Zimmerman’s eyes he most certainly was “out of place”

In the end...did Zimmerman find himself on the losing end of a physical altercation and have to fight back?
It looks that way.

The whole thing was completely avoidable.


160 posted on 03/26/2012 6:24:28 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson