[Ecliptic]

If you are on the street and someone confronts you, you have the right to defend yourself. Let me say it this way:IF ZIMMERMAN HAD STAYED IN THE CAR AND WAITED ON THE COPS, THIS WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED. THE DISPATCHER TOLD HIM TO WAIT. SOMEONE WALKING DOWN THE STREET DOES NOT NEED IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. BEING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH MEANS YOU OBSERVE AND REPORT TO HE COPS. YOU STAY IN THE CAR. IF ZIMMERMAN THOUGHT THIS GUY WAS A DANGER, HE SHOULD NOT HAVE GOTTEN OUT OF HIS CAR.

[DesertRhino]

If Zim would have simply continued observing,, he would have seen Trevon walk into his front door. There was no immediate need for Zimm to confront him.

[101stAirborneVet]

IF ZIMMERMAN HAD STAYED IN THE CAR AND WAITED ON THE COPS, THIS WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED.

If Martin hadn't gone for Skittles, this would not have happened.

See how your emotional assertions that have no basis in law are completely useless to this discussion?

[Ajnin]

Like I said, nice double standard you have. Instead of trying to wiggle out of the obvious hypocrisy of your statement why don't you jsut admit you are wrong.

Unless you were there and are a witness you are wrong.