"When I got upstairs and looked down, the guy who was on top beating up the other guy, was the one laying in the grass, and I believe he was dead at that point," John said.
In other words, the witness said the guy (Martin) he saw first attacked then when he looked back, he was the one on the ground shot. It is pretty badly written.
It’s gonna be pretty easy to determine if a man was shot on the ground while on his back, or if a man on top was shot while the shooter was being pummeled.
It’s gonna be pretty easy to determine if a man was shot on the ground while on his back, or if a man on top was shot while the shooter was being pummeled.
It may be less difficult to determine who escalated what.
Actually, what he said was the guy in the hoodie(Martin)was sitting on the guy in the red shirt(Zimmerman)beating him and the guy in the Red Shirt(Zimmerman)was yelling for help. When he looked back the guy doing the beating(the one on top)was laying on the ground and most likely dead. Sounds like self defense to me.
So instead of clarity the article continues the madness and race-baiting. Who does that help?