Replies

I’m still here, thouworm.

1) I think *everything* 0bummer has done/is doing/will do is about his winning the General Election. His BS about being a 1-termer if he doesn’t get it done in 3-4yrs, was just that: BS. Florida is in play, I’ve read, and so are 5-6 other states. I wonder if he’ll jump into any of those for the publicity? Hard to say, but since he’s a socialist race-baiter, I’d bet $10 he does, given the *right opportunity* such as the Zimmerman-Martin case.

2) THAT merits a much closer look; I’ve never researched it, but have always thought there were some within the GOP-e ranks somewhere. An interesting article here:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/11/07/bachmann-targets-frugal-socialists-in-republican-party/

Consider the “sources” on these “GOP socialist” related articles:

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/nov/20/news/la-pn-bachmann-book-20111120

http://www.newdeal20.org/2011/12/06/how-the-gop-became-americas-socialist-party-66360/

http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-12-06/politics/30480503_1_cuts-taxes-karl-marx-conservatism

I’ll keep nosing around and see what I can find of more substance.GOP socialist

Thanks for your thoughtful opinion and links. Think Fla incident is a perfect setup. Ironic that the “murderer” was first cast by the MSM as a “white” man-—over and over again-—only to find out later that he is Hispanic. Nevertheless, the grievance was set in place, and an army of sycophants were marshaled to commandeer the narrative-—facts sketchy but facts be damned.

As for Socialists in the GOP, I am astonished that I have not seen anything on this (and I have been a prolific researcher and purveyor of the alternate news media). I assume I may have missed relevant threads or posts, but why would such information not be in the forefront of our FR discussions? Why be content to call a GOPer a RINO, without digging deeper? RINO comprises a category of those willing to compromise the conservative ideology to retain their power base (anti-Tea Party) and those GOPers that believe they need to be moderate to win their local elections.

In the past I have accused Repubs of being either complicit or comatose, but I am shocked to admit I never asked myself who, if any, Repubs are Socialists.

If such persons exist, it would go quite a ways to explain much of the behavior of the GOP leadership (and the silence of GOP Congressmen newcomers).

Heretofore, we have only accused them of being too meek, too much of an “old-school gentleman,” and too unwilling to engage in the amoral street-thuggery of the Dems. My question is, What if they are ideologically in bed with the “moderate” Dem Socialists? If so, we have an obligation to know who they are and call them out on it.

Don’t know; just asking the question, and wondering why it hasn’t been asked before.

Please ping me if you see anything on this, and I will do the same. I may decide to post a vanity thread on the subject.