[SoldierDad]

No, sorry. Not true. I still am of the opinion that all the facts have not been obtained, and that an independent investigation is warranted to make sure those facts are accurate. I'm still unconvinced that Zimmerman acted in self-defense given the possibility that the initiation of the confrontation came from his own behavior. So, where have I contradicted myself? Never mind. Conversing with you has been akin to trying to speak to a brick wall.

Obtuse: 1. not quick or alert in perception, feeling, or intellect; not sensitive or observant; dull . 2. not sharp, acute, or pointed; blunt in form. 3. (of a leaf, petal, etc.) rounded

' I'll leave you with the advice that you seek help.

[dragnet2]

I still am of the opinion that all the facts have not been obtained

Opinion based on what?

[TigersEye]

post #2

Local authorities did a lousy job of investigating the incident, and there needs to be a thorough and unbiased investigation.

A statement of absolute certainty directly implying your knowledge of the facts.

post #142

As I stated, there’s conflicting information. What is accurate and what is not needs to be determined.

A statement indicating no certain knowledge of the facts.

Yep, you contradicted yourself completely. Undoubtedly you are too obtuse, dense and need to much help to understand it but there it is in black and white.

[TigersEye]

Conversing with you has been akin to trying to speak to a brick wall.

As I'm sure your therapist has told you that is a wonderful example of projection.

[101stAirborneVet]

“Obtuse: 1. not quick or alert in perception, feeling, or intellect; not sensitive or observant; dull . 2. not sharp, acute, or pointed; blunt in form. 3. (of a leaf, petal, etc.) rounded

’ I’ll leave you with the advice that you seek help.”

Sorry, but I think this was not quite in the FReeper spirit.