Fortunately, he’s also demonstrated he has the brains not to.
***Argument from silence. Classic Fallacy.
Do you?
***What difference does it make whether I do or not? This is about Newt, Santorum, zer0bama and RomNitt.
Argument from silence can be a convincing form of abductive reasoning.
At any rate, the burden of proof would seem to be on you.
But, of course, you chose to pose your ad hominem as a question, so you can dodge that bullet.
What do they call that?