Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NMCicero

“in doing so he took the law into his own hands, which makes him nothing more than an armed vigilante serving up his version of street justice. Those actions make him a danger to civilized society, and I believe that as conservatives we ought to defend the rule of law above all other things.”


Jumping to a conclusion that a man is guilty before proven so is an even greater danger to civilized society.


45 posted on 03/22/2012 3:28:48 PM PDT by Lucas McCain (Santorum sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Lucas McCain

Innocent until proven guilty is merely a legal concept that has a meaningful context only within the criminal justice system. As a private individual, I’m certainly free to make judgments about people based on the evidence available to me regarding their actions or character, and until I see some reason to think that Mr. Zimmerman is an innocent victim in all of this, I will continue to say that personally, I think he’s guilty of terrible judgment at a minimum, and is likely guilty of homicide as well. But, of course, I am not the one who will decide his fate, that will ultimately be up to a jury, if this goes as I imagine it will. (At this point I can’t imagine that Mr. Zimmerman will not be indicted.) I will fully admit that Mr. Zimmerman is fortunate that I will not be among the jury pool.

Having listened to the 911 tapes, I have no reason at all to believe that Mr. Zimmerman was anything but what he appears to be, and that is an armed vigilante who chose to pursue a child who had committed no offense. He was told to stay put and to wait for the police, he decided to take a different course of action, and the consequences of that choice are a dead boy and a probable prison sentence for Mr. Zimmerman.

As my mother used to tell me, if you go looking for trouble, you’re bound to find it.


47 posted on 03/22/2012 3:47:25 PM PDT by NMCicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Lucas McCain

Innocent until proven guilty is merely a legal concept that has a meaningful context only within the criminal justice system. As a private individual, I’m certainly free to make judgments about people based on the evidence available to me regarding their actions or character, and until I see some reason to think that Mr. Zimmerman is an innocent victim in all of this, I will continue to say that personally, I think he’s guilty of terrible judgment at a minimum, and is likely guilty of homicide as well. But, of course, I am not the one who will decide his fate, that will ultimately be up to a jury, if this goes as I imagine it will. (At this point I can’t imagine that Mr. Zimmerman will not be indicted.) I will fully admit that Mr. Zimmerman is fortunate that I will not be among the jury pool.

Having listened to the 911 tapes, I have no reason at all to believe that Mr. Zimmerman was anything but what he appears to be, and that is an armed vigilante who chose to pursue a child who had committed no offense. He was told to stay put and to wait for the police, he decided to take a different course of action, and the consequences of that choice are a dead boy and a probable prison sentence for Mr. Zimmerman.

As my mother used to tell me, if you go looking for trouble, you’re bound to find it.


48 posted on 03/22/2012 3:47:58 PM PDT by NMCicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson