Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
Zimmerman has yet to be demonstrated to have had a right to follow a guy around a public street stalking him.

Good grief..it wasn't a public street, it was private property with gates across the road and everything. People don't have the right to just wander in, and neither Martin or his father lived there.

Zimmerman doesn't have to justify his following Martin..Martin has to justify his presence on private property of which Zimmerman is one of the owners.

158 posted on 03/22/2012 5:02:53 PM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: mac_truck

You must have read a lot of posts already and know there are “gaps’. Please prove each and every contention you just made.


160 posted on 03/22/2012 7:03:19 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

To: mac_truck
The address Zimmerman gave the cops was "111". That's on a building on the PUBLIC street that parallels the interior circulator road for the development.

So, that's where Zimmerman was ~ on a public road ~ and he'd followed Martin from where?

Zimmerman was EVASIVE ~ that's the word bill collectors (and lawyers) use when a supposed expert can't tell you something he should know ~ like the address of where he's at in a community where he's a neighborhood watch "captain".

Now, regarding ballistics ~ anyone know what the coroner's report says?

165 posted on 03/22/2012 7:14:16 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson