Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/21/2012 7:41:24 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sukhoi-30mki

Sadly, the Brits are coming to the realization that cradle-to-grave socialism and a robust ‘defence’ posture are incompatible. They basically gutted the RN’s budget to build these two carriers, and now .....

Sad, Larry, just sad.


2 posted on 03/21/2012 7:50:03 AM PDT by tgusa (gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger .......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“Unnecessary” until they need them.


3 posted on 03/21/2012 7:50:33 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“These 650,000-ton, 280 metre-long behemoths are of a complexity and size never attempted (the US Nimitz class carriers are larger, but certainly less advanced).

I worked on designing the new Brit carriers in 2003. I am here to tell you, the Nimitz carriers outclass them by a mile, and the Ford class will be coming online well before HMS Queen Elizabeth is launched. And unless I miss my guess, they are 65,000 ton ships. The Nimitz class is 90,000 tons.


4 posted on 03/21/2012 7:57:28 AM PDT by tgusa (gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger .......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

What a load of crap the Nimitz own the little british carriers, and the newer boats Gerald ford etc will continue the trend.


7 posted on 03/21/2012 8:01:15 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

They thought carriers were unnecessary back in 1982 when they were ready to decommission the Hermes, and the first of the new Invincible class was just coming into the fleet and was already being proposed for sale to Australia.

Then the Falklands War came along and the UK canceled the plans to decommission the Hermes and rushed the Invincible into service. It is doubtful the UK could have taken back those islands without those carriers.

As it was the UK suffered severe naval losses in terms of dstroyers, firgates, and support vessels sunk in winning those Ilsands.

The Hermes went on to serve with the Royal Navy until 1986 when she was sold to India as two more Invincible class carriers came online for the UK.

Those three small, jump-jet carriers have served well and ably ever since.

Now, the UK is reliving history.

They have decommissioned two of the Invincible class already and taken all of the naval Sea Harriers out of service. They refit the sole remaining carrier, the Illustrious, into a helo-carrier and amphibious assault ship.

They are building two new large conventional carriers, but the first, the Queen Elizabeth will come out in 2016 with no catapaults or arrestors and no aircraft and also be turned immediately into a huge amphibious assault and helo carrier.

The second, the Prince of Wales will come out in 2018 with cats, arrestors, and a squadron of F-35Cs ready for that carrier by 2020. So, until 2020, the UK has no capable aircraft carriers. That’s an 8 year window for adversaries to try and conduct mischief...and Argentina is beatig the war drums again...though they are in even worse shape, and, the UK has stationed sufficient troops, modern aircraft (Typhoons) on the island, and warships around the island (a Offshore Patrol vessel, a destroyer, and a nuclear attck sub) to keep any repeat of 1982 from happening.

Once the Prince of Wales has its aircraft, the Queen Elizabeth will go into refit to add the catapaults and arrestors and then she will re-enter service in 2022-2023. At that point the UK will have two capable carriers and through the use of maintenance layovers and refits through their life, will always have one large and veru capable fixed wing aircraft carrier available for use with a couple of squadrons of F-35Cs.

Sad how protracted and wierd their procurement, building, and induction into the fleet has become...but it is due to the liberal mind set of their government and the socialistic nature of their nation which has reduced defense spending to the point that they have such a debacle.

See:

World-Wide Aircraft Carriers - Queen Elizabeth Class
http://www.jeffhead.com/worldwideaircraftcarriers/QueenE.htm


12 posted on 03/21/2012 8:45:04 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I’m not sure what, if anything, the Brits and French will end up building for aircraft carriers, but I am very confident that the monicker “World’s most advanced ships.” will not apply.


14 posted on 03/21/2012 8:59:06 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: magslinger

ping


26 posted on 03/21/2012 1:22:22 PM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Apart from the cost of purchase and installation of catapult and arresting gear is the manpower bill. On a US CVN the crews operating this equipment number around 200-250. I would bet that this figures prominently in the ongoing debate at the MoD.


27 posted on 03/21/2012 1:26:26 PM PDT by paddles ("The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; investigateworld; lowbuck; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Photobucket

Click on pic for past Navair pings. Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist. The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation. This is a medium to low volume pinglist.

28 posted on 03/21/2012 2:04:29 PM PDT by magslinger (If I wanted to vote for a Commie I would vote for Obammie. He has a chance of winning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The Royal Navy should get real...and efficient.

They have no need for the power project capability of a real Carrier.

I would MUCH rather see them with 5 Heavy Cruisers, 15 Aegis Destroyers, 25 Light, modern Frigates and 20 subs...10 nukes and 10 of the new, advanced diesels.

Plus their 3-4 Boomers.

It's time for them to let go.

29 posted on 03/21/2012 5:41:49 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson