Senators don’t do well either, but especially those who lose their seat by 18 points.
Romney is a MA liberal masquerading as a conservative when it suits him, but even now he constantly slips up and shows his true colors, because that can’t be helped. Such kinds of truths will out, as they say.
Tell you what, you join with Steely Tom who says it’s aaaaaaaalllllllll in the name and what your enemies can do to twist it around, and the both of you post downers to your hearts’ content.
You won’t find me there.
And that will be true, regardless of what happens.
:)
No, it’s not in the name. Plenty of Gingrich acolytes have distorted the name to disrespect and marginalize Santorum, then didn’t like when I returned in kind. You haven’t done that, so neither will I. My point is different and addresses nominatibility rather than suitability. Do I see the one I think best by temperment and experience in this group? No, nor is she likely to rescue us. My second choice is Santorum, given the others. No pressure or name-calling (there’s been plenty) will sway me from this conclusion, nor do I expect those who support Newt to be pressured out of it. If it were Santorum vs Romney alone, you wouldn’t find 50% of Santorum supporters going for Romney, but we’d be praying for another choice at the convention.