Posted on 03/18/2012 7:18:30 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Yet, another example of how Romney is BHO lite.
At a moment in history when we need a bold commitment to reform, a fundamental willingness to limit the state and revitalize self-government, Romneys achievements and qualifications seem out of step with the times.
The GOP establishment is trying to force yet another establishment hack on us, oblivious to (or worse unwilling to give us) the drastic deconstruction of the the government we want
There... fixed it
Am I wrong or is this whole state’s rights thing not work so good as of late? Especially, when you have a jr dictator using the Federal government to supercedes a state’s decisions?
You know like how Obama stuck his big ears in Az over immigration. And, recently in NC In the seemingly neverending crusade to pervert thats states definition of marriage?
So he is arguing the government can easily get the money owed if they call it a tax, and they cannot get the money owed if it is called a debt.
And he wonders why there is such a disconnect.
Similarly Ms. Fluke wants her "health care" to be between her and her doctor, but not the one who is paying for it. But when you invite your fellow citizens in to pay, then you have inextricably given them a say in your health care.
Exactly why Conservatives do not like Romney.
He is Obama with no tan.
I am against Obama, not because he is black, but because of his policies, Why would I wantto replace him with a white man with the same policies?
Simple, I don’t—it has nothing to do with race. It is Obama’s spending spree, his Obamacare, his rejection of our friends and his helping the Muslim Brotherhood.
I don’t know about Obama’s Birth certificate, but born here or not Obama is no American. Nor is Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid or Steny Hoyer.
It's his name. Ging-ritch. It already sounds like a nasty word, and the media would turn it into a swear-word before by his second year in office. In 2014, the MSM will make sure that every single Republican in the House and the Senate is tied right to Gingritch. 2014 would be a rout of historic proportions. The Democrat rabble that is washed in in the wake of this debacle will be made up of worse than Alan Greyson and Anthony Weiner. In fact, those two might very swirl back in, and they'll be among the moderates. They'll use Gingritch just like they used Boosh. Make it into an obscenity. And our "new" American electorate will eat it up. Mark my words.
Gingritch gone in one, just like Obama. Tit for tat. The MSM will make it so. Sorry to be the bringer of such bad news. I don't like it either.
.
.
.
Very interesting blast from the past.
BUMP!
Do as you please and talk yourself into paralysis over what can be done to someone’s name.
You won’t find me joining in, whatever happens.
Is the answer the NAME Santorum?
Already it has become Sanctitorum or just plain Rick Sanctimonious.
Some say, Saint Rick.
The only complaint I ever heard about Gingrich’s same was the Newt part. People said, who would want a President called Newt?
People can’t change their name or what their detractors decide to do with their name.
Obsess on that as the death knell if you wish.
Obama’s name has had everything under the sun done to it.
There’s a book in a chain bookstore, but by a local author, called “Obamanation”.
We are going with IDEAS. If a name does you in, the country is gone anyhow.
Gingrich for good or ill stands no chance for the GOP top spot, because his elected experience is all in the House.
In fact, Garfield is the last elected president whose experience was last in the House. This ensures also no “President Ron Paul”.
Senators don’t do well either, but especially those who lose their seat by 18 points.
Romney is a MA liberal masquerading as a conservative when it suits him, but even now he constantly slips up and shows his true colors, because that can’t be helped. Such kinds of truths will out, as they say.
Tell you what, you join with Steely Tom who says it’s aaaaaaaalllllllll in the name and what your enemies can do to twist it around, and the both of you post downers to your hearts’ content.
You won’t find me there.
And that will be true, regardless of what happens.
Huh??
From my perspective, that's a lot of pluses +++++++++++ in his favor. Then too, he was the SPEAKER of the House that brought us the Republican revolution in 1994.
:)
Here, I've fixed it.
“I am against Obama, not because he is black, but because of his policies”
He’s not even black, but he pretends to be.
He is black when he wants to be.
He is filled with hatred for anything white.
He is a typical Mulatto. Mad at both parents for what he is, but leaning towards his black side because he is accepted easier there.
His “black” side is Arab. Many Arabs are black.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.