Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stormer
...having charges dropped is not indicative of innocence, but of a prosecutor not believing he has a case that he can prove in court.

Now that video cameras on cell phones are becoming common, we are seeing a lot of cases where police arrests and charges of disorderly conduct and resisting arrest are shown to be merely police covers for their own misconduct.

There is always a reason that a prosecutor does not believe he has a case he can win, and a combination of factual innocence and police misconduct is something that can lead him to drop charges.

I don't assume every person arrested is innocent, but I am realistic enough to know that false arrests are much more common than the police would like us to believe.

109 posted on 03/18/2012 2:26:03 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: CurlyDave

No question that there is much more poilice misconduct that previously acknowledged. My own city is struggling with a few high profile cases with right now, and nobody is very happy about any of it. As far as Mr Zimmermann is concerned, I ran accross this: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/03/17/v-fullstory/2700249/shooter-of-trayvon-martin-a-habitual.html#storylink=cpy

“As for any past legal blemishes, he was once arrested for battery on a law enforcement officer when he interfered in a friend’s arrest. The charge was reduced to simple battery, and he entered a plea that allowed him to have a clean record and qualify for a concealed weapons permit.”

This is a bit different than the story we’ve been hearing...


110 posted on 03/18/2012 4:29:00 PM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson