To: Brown Deer
I will answer the question after you show me where in the treaty it has meaning besides the end of the angled, western border.
76 posted on
03/19/2012 11:23:18 AM PDT by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: thackney; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; ...
The last clause of Article I states, "...
to the meridian of one hundred and ninety-three degrees west longitude [167 degrees east]
, so as to include in the territory conveyed the whole of the Aleutian islands east of that meridian."
Why do you keep avoiding the question? Why is it so important to you do defend your president? Why do you continue to call it a myth that the Hon. Joseph Miller wrote the following:
"
But as an executive agreement, it could be reversed with the stroke of a pen by President Obama or Secretary Clinton.
The agreement was negotiated in total secrecy. The state of Alaska was not allowed to participate in the negotiations, nor was the public given any opportunity for comment. This is despite the fact the Alaska Legislature has passed resolutions of opposition but the State Department doesnt seem to care."
77 posted on
03/19/2012 12:07:31 PM PDT by
Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
To: thackney
I will answer the question after you show me where in the treaty it has meaning besides the end of the angled, western border.
LIAR!
95 posted on
03/20/2012 2:23:40 PM PDT by
Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson