I agree with your analysis.
The teen was unarmed. He was in his father’s community and returning to his home after a trip to buy candy. He could be my son or my grandson.
There is far too much blaming the victim on this thread and excusing the killer.
The teen was unarmed. He was in his fathers community and returning to his home after a trip to buy candy. He could be my son or my grandson.
It is not analysis, it is speculation.
We simply do not know what interaction the kid and Mr. Zimmerman had with one another before things got physical, nor do we know which one first attacked the other.
Observing these simple facts is not "excusing the killer". Rather, it is "not being a retard".