Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shimmer1
He had a bloody nose, the kid didn’t beat him to a bloody pulp.

Like you said, you have no evidence regarding who attacked who first.

As for the bloody nose, one blow can cause a person to lose consciousness and then be completely defenseless against further mayhem. It happens all of the time. Ghetto thugs knock someone out and then proceed to maim or kill them. There is no reason for Zimmerman to risk this. This whole "it was just a fistfight" line is garbage. If you attack an innocent person then you deserve what you get. I do not know whether Zimmerman was completely innocent, but I have seen no evidence indicating otherwise.

46 posted on 03/16/2012 12:54:15 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: rogue yam

Many on this thread are assuming, because the dead kid was black, that he was a ghetto thug.
I disagree with this assessment. But the boy wasn’t after Z to stop and explain his presence, but Zimmerman was after the kid to stop and explain his presence, so I still think that Z brought a gun to the fist fight.
It’s just my opinion, but I’m sure this warrants further examination by the authorities.


67 posted on 03/16/2012 6:33:53 PM PDT by Shimmer1 (If my body dies, then let it die, but let my country live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson