Replies

I believe this article that you have kindly posted here clears the head a little and airs out my head for the state of the race, as it really is.

I have never been a Palin fan, back when she was all the rage, as I considered her to be grossly under qualified, thinking she was absolutely crazy to seriously think herself a president and overnight drop her life for the progressive peacock, John McCain, BUT, I never underestimated her ability to be a MOVEMENT
“candidate”, “personality”, “torch bearer” and friendly face to put on courage, liberty and freedom.

New is anything but underqualified, and I have softened to the theme that some hell could be raised and filled in the gaps for the other.

Newt is seen as the brooding intellect emersed in political savy, on a national and international scale, and in hand to hand combat to having successfully devoured the Democrat Party.

Sarah Palin translates to the heart with her ability to torch bear for all the shattered principles that Newt Gingrich would methodically resurrect.

A MOVEMENT is the ONLY way to divert collapse. These two individuals are the only ones on the scene who are of MOVEMENT caliber.

We have failed these many months to be MOVEMENT oriented confining ourselves to our keyboards and I believe we need to decide what a MOVEMENT is and what we can do to create one, and willing to take the heat such a thing will bring.

We have not much time and neither of our two heroes have offered to step out of the shadows of obviously safe and comfortable punditry and lead it. It would be painful for them to take such a risk, maybe dangerous, but making a few appearances in small venues and getting seven minutes on FAUX is just not cutting it.

You are dead on about those two people, Sarah and Newt.

The only way Sarah gets on the ticket is through a brokered convention, or be asked onto a ticket by Newt either before or after heading the ticket himself...the latter also through a brokered convention or a political miracle between now and then.

Both of them have indicated...Newt more than Sarah because he’s always being asked about it...that they will support the winner against Obama.

It so pains Newt to say that. He was asked point blank about Romney as a standard bearer, just recently, and he paused, then cryptically said “He’s better than Obama”.

Then the question was reworded and he was given a chance to alter his response. Another pause, then the same cryptic words, “He’s better than Obama”.

So I’m wondering, if a Movement, do you mean after Romney gets the nomination if he does get it?

Or do you mean leading up to the Covention, or at the Convention?