Øbama = POS
with all due respect to pieces of excrement.
Just because two lesbians are not able to produce a baby, it doesn’t mean that either are infirtle.
Also, just because the taxpayers are not required to pay for someone’s treatment, it’s misleading to use the term “barred from receiving” when referring to the hopeful recipients of tax-paid services.
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
Also:
There is only *one* who decides who should bear children and who should not - and I don't expect Obama to understand that.
The really interesting part of Obama's "reasoning" here is that he argues the government - which is really the people - has no right to determine that a infertile lesbian couple remain childless via lack of treatment, yet he has no problem with the government forcing the people to pay to murder the innocent child in a fertile woman's womb.
I’m still stuck in the late 80’s. Exactly how do you determine that somebody can be considered legally gay or lesbian? Do you have to sign an affidavit and produce witnesses that you’ve had gay or lesbian sex?
Can gay brothers or lesbian sisters marry each other?
Can a heterosexual couple have a dna test performed on their unborn child and abort it if it has a gay or lesbian gene?
Is a transgendered male to female, considered infertile and it mandated by healthcare laws that they receive infertility treatments?
What I find most interesting, is why we have not EVER heard from any of Prof. Obama’s students.....
Hmmmm.....you’d think SOMEONE would speak up....whether for him or against him...someone? Anyone?
Buehler? Buehler??
"The question deals with a hypothetical lesbian couple that wants to have a baby. Their state prevents health providers from providing infertility treatments for unwed couples; the couple’s state-provided healthcare therefore refuses them coverage for such procedures.
I know this is preaching to the choir, here, but I wanna rant anyway:
1. There should be no place for 'state-provided healthcare'.
2. Infertility treatments are not "healthcare" even if there is such a thing called 'state-provided healthcare'.
3. Elective care such as Infertility Treatments should never be covered even if you don't believe in either #1 or #2. It is highly expensive and has limited success rates. It also tends to have complications (as in multiple births, just for one small example).
4. If you can't afford an Infertility Treatment, then how on earth can you afford a child???
5. So if the state is doing both #1 and #2, and you end up with a child, now the state also has to support you supporting the child. Is this enough nonsense for you yet, you public policy makers??
6. And finally: if you don't have 'state-provided healthcare' and don't do infertility treatments, then you don't have to worry about the homosexual complications, now, do you? You also probably don't spend nearly as much money in your state budget, and can lower the state taxes, and then everybody can afford to do want they want to do on their own!!
< /end rant... cleansing breath >
This from a late term abortion voter.