Being able to understand an issue involves knowing the right questions to ask, and you clearly do not and therefore did not. But I’ll address your three questions anyway:
1: Can I assume you think driving is a right with no restrictions. I assume that means you do not understand that the right to drive in any way shape or form takes away my rights to share the same roads with common sense.
2: Huh? This is a narrow provision and you are broadening it way way out.
3. Again, we are talking about a narrow provision and you are broadening it way out of proportion.
You clearly just wanted an ideologically pure fight today and you picked a stupid issue upon which to have your fight and now you’re in a corner and the paint is not dry yet.
I have made it clear that I support restrictions on driving (including a ban on texting while driving), at the state level. Ny poinit is that the Federal government has no business getting involved in this.