Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ollies girl
A lot of what is in the bill makes sense...ON THE STATE LEVEL. I am all for states banning texting while driving and making sure their young drivers are properly trained. I don't think of it as inherently, “nanny state”.

However, on the Federal level, it is outrageous. These, “we'll give you funding if you comply with our mandate laws” completely undermine states rights.

They are nothing short of Federal extortion and can be used to pretty much mandate ANYTHING. They essentially say, “comply with our rules or the citizens of your state will continue to send huge amounts of money to Washington and get even LESS back than citizens of states that comply.” As a result, state and local taxes will have to rise to make up for the decreased kickback of the taxes the Federal government already fleeced the taxpayers for.

Colonel West should be ashamed of himself for undermining the Constitution and promoting additional Federal abuse of power.

20 posted on 03/15/2012 9:01:51 AM PDT by Above My Pay Grade (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Above My Pay Grade

You make some good points, but with due respect, your conclusion is ludicrous. Allen West did not invent the notion that we have an interstate highway system, but we do. Thus, driving cannot be a “state” issue.

It just can’t. So to say West should be ashamed is a knee jerk over react. To disagree is something else. But sorry, you cannot justify interstate highways as a state issue. Think of the practical impossibilties of what you are saying .


23 posted on 03/15/2012 9:15:16 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson