(Someone posted yesterday an article intimating there would be something coming out in the next few days that could tie Rick to the Paterno/Sandusky scandal in some way.)
Caveat: The allegation was vague and referred to Dem sources that had been credible before. No proof was offered; therefore, since the article was entirely speculative, it may well be more “dirty tricks” from the Dems, Romney campaign or others.
When we are then committed, they will unload a whole lot more than the Paterno/Sandusky scandal. There is “K” Street, the stillborn 8th child, as well as many of Santorum’s corrupt dealings that awarded him the vote for “Most corrupt” Senator.
This is just the tip of the iceberg. There are volumes about him ready to come out when the time is right.
This is why I am making such a hard effort to get the facts out about Santorum, to reverse this brainless infatuation the base has with him.
>>Newt staying in also acts as an “insurance policy” in case something unforseen causes Rick’s campaign to “tank.”
This is an extremely good point, and one that is rarely considered in this debate.
Newt staying in also acts as an “insurance policy” in case something unforseen causes Rick’s campaign to “tank.”
If both stay in, conservatives can cast a ballot for their favored candidate that isn’t Romney and deny him a coronation in Tampa.
I have been debating whether to switch to Santorum from Newt. I think these 2 points drive home my desire to support Newt full steam. Is a brokered convention a good thing? I don’t know. Would it lead to Obama being reelected? Possibly. Would Romney being President change anything? I say no.
“...an article intimating there would be something coming out in the next few days that could tie Rick to the Paterno/Sandusky scandal in some way.”
The Romney sleeze machine at work. Unbelievable.