Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Psalm 144

In the biological sense of the term ‘men’ perhaps. Personally I wouldn’t call any genetic male subscribing to Islam for any reason a “Man”.

Coward, Homosexual, pedophile, misogynist, liar, crook, scum...all that sure since they demonstrate it every hour of every day. But ‘Man”? Not in a thousand fatwas.


23 posted on 03/14/2012 11:59:19 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Norm Lenhart

Male hominid then. But your point is valid. The Religion of Peace as we were instructed to regard it caters to and inflames every base, abusive, merciless vice the male of the species is capable of. That is precisely -why- it can be made attractive, like porn or the Nuremburg rally or a May Day parade.


24 posted on 03/14/2012 12:10:15 PM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I think we ought to listen to Alinsky." - Governor G. Romney, father of Bishop Willard M. Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson