Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pearls Before Swine
The “prisoner's dilemma” usually involves two suspects. The first one to rat out the other wins — the "ratee" gets a long sentence. If neither confess or “snitch”, they both walk (or close to it).

AFAIK, the police use this strategy frequently, to get petty drug dealers to finger their suppliers. Criminals, of course, have their own sanctions against snitching.

The problem with this type of plea (whereby someone else is fingered), is the incentive it provides for false accusations.

24 posted on 03/12/2012 4:51:18 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
The “prisoner's dilemma” usually involves two suspects. The first one to rat out the other wins — the "ratee" gets a long sentence. If neither confess or “snitch”, they both walk (or close to it).

Yeah, I know that's the full statement of the "minimax" problem. Either suspect does best if they don't snitch first, but they can't trust each other or communicate, so that isn't their best choice.

Still, the situation here with an overcharged sentence, an overcharging but overburdened attorney, and a suspect in the middle is somewhat reminiscent of the classic problem. Besides, I got in a pun with "prisoner's dilemma," didn't I?

40 posted on 03/12/2012 7:18:54 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson