[Hunton Peck]

April 28, 2008. The opinion is here: http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/07-21.pdf

(It is weird that there’s hardly any clue in the article as to the date)

[True Republican Patriot]

Thank you so much for the confirmation date of April 28, 2008!
Why four years later is the Department of Justice saying FU! to SCOTUS!!! a ruling made on April 28, 2008??
Is there any American Law that the Obama HUSSEIN Regime will not trample, ignore, and willfully VIOLATE in their Destruction of AMERICA!!
THIS IS HIGH TREASON OF THE NINTH DEGREE!! This Scum Bag in the Oval Office s the Biggest Fraud and Criminal in the History of this PLANET!! and he is laughing his Gay BUTT off over our Political Correctness and Stupidity!!
There is NO DOCUMENT ABOUT HIS ENTIRE HISTORY THAT IS NOT HIDDEN, OBFUSCATED, and or DISAPPEARED!!! THATS CRIMINAL!! and BULLSHIT!!
Dan Rather tried to fry George W. Bush on one minor paragraph memo that turned out to be A blatant fraud that got RATHER FREAKIN FIRED!!
WAKE UP AMERICA! This isn’t a discussion, the Left are Communists and Worse that are hell Bent on Destroying America! They HATE AMERICA’S FREEDOMS and OUR SUCCESS!

[JewishRighter]

Thanks for that link. I quote just the first paragraph of the syllabus, a sort of summary of the ruling, to show you just how craven and crooked these judges are, because the United States Supreme Court, which they are obligated to follow, has made it exceptionally clear that the voter ID law is constitutional:

After Indiana enacted an election law (SEA 483) requiring citizens voting in person to present government-issued photo identification, petitioners filed separate suits challenging the law’s constitutionality. Following discovery, the District Court granted respondents summary judgment, finding the evidence in the record insufficient to support a facial attack on the statute’s validity. In affirming, the Seventh Circuit declined to judge the law by the strict standard set for poll taxes in Harper v. Virginia Bd. of Elections, 383 U. S. 663, finding the burden on voters offset by the benefit of reducing the risk of fraud. Held: The judgment is affirmed.