Libs will never give in on this - it’s all they have left.
Can we just dip our finger into a jar of sterile, non-allergenic purple dye after we vote — whose right would that violate?
Can we just dip our finger into a jar of sterile, non-allergenic purple dye after we vote — whose right would that violate?
You are exactly right, it does not violate anyone’s right.
It is simple and it makes sense. What if you went a step further and had each voter dip their finger in indelible purple ink and then put their fingerprint on their ballot. Would that infringe on any rights? Just thinking of some way to eliminate the rampant fraud.
“Libs will never give in on this - it’s all they have left.
Can we just dip our finger into a jar of sterile, non-allergenic purple dye after we vote — whose right would that violate?”
I see you look to be from Georgia.
Refresh my memory — wasn’t it just a couple of years ago that this issue came before the United States Supreme Court in Georgia? And did not the Court rule in favor of GA, that is, that the state could require voters to produce I.D. at the polls?
If it is “Constitutional” to require voter I.D. down there, why would be unConstitutional to prohibit the display of same elsewhere?
Or am I missing something?