[jacknhoo]

"All of the candidates are Pro-Life except Romney. There needs to be more criteria than just that."

100% ProLife...you need to re-read my words. There are more criteria than that. All other criteria is subservient to life...without the firm belief in the sanctity and dignity of human life, then whatever else one believes is built-up on a weak foundation.

FYI...being ProLife is not defined as being against abortion, except in the cases of rape and incest or a mother's health - that is a ProAbortion stance.

Being ProLife means one does not support human embryonic stem cell research or human cloning for research and organ harvesting.

Being ProLife does not mean that one believes individual states have the right to kill innocent defenseless humans - murder should always be illegal everywhere.

Being ProLife does not mean the federal government has no say in the morality of these United States of America.

Rick Santorum is our only 100% ProLife candidate!

[Utmost Certainty]

Pretty sure Newt fits your bill of being 100% Pro-Life as well. He’s spoken of tweaking the 14th amendment such that it would read “personhood begins at conception.” See here: http://freethoughtblogs.com/dispatches/2011/11/23/gingrich-outlaw-judicial-review/

[JediJones]

Being ProLife does not mean that one believes individual states have the right to kill innocent defenseless humans - murder should always be illegal everywhere.

Where has Rick said that he supports a constitutional amendment banning abortion federally? If he hasn't, then that means he's not 100% pro-life.