Skip to comments.
The Big Battery Breakthrough
Car Talk ^
| 7 Mar 12
| Jim Motovalli
Posted on 03/11/2012 10:19:20 AM PDT by NavVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Doubled the energy density, while cutting costs per KW/H more than in half. If this pans out,an AFFORDABLE electric cars with a 300 mile range could be just around the corner.
1
posted on
03/11/2012 10:19:28 AM PDT
by
NavVet
To: NavVet
Sure is a mighty big corner.
2
posted on
03/11/2012 10:21:17 AM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: NavVet
zero will probably funnel some cash to them....
3
posted on
03/11/2012 10:22:13 AM PDT
by
illiac
(If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
To: NavVet
Not in the cold, and still powered by “dirty” sources. In others words, still crap for vehicles.
4
posted on
03/11/2012 10:23:12 AM PDT
by
vpintheak
(Occupy your Brain!)
To: NavVet
If this pans out,an AFFORDABLE electric cars with a 300 mile range could be just around the corner. Talking points for Zer0 and the MARXIST media.
5
posted on
03/11/2012 10:23:30 AM PDT
by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
To: NavVet
Doubled the energy density, while cutting costs per KW/H more than in half. If this pans out,an AFFORDABLE electric cars with a 300 mile range could be just around the corner. More like 40 mile range could be just around the corner ... providing the batteries actually last for a while, recharge without exploding, and work in cold weather.
6
posted on
03/11/2012 10:24:08 AM PDT
by
Zakeet
(Obozo is to competent as an Etch-A-Sketch is to art)
To: NavVet
Its impossible to verify all that...If this pans out,an AFFORDABLE electric cars with a 300 mile range could be just around the corner.
So, just to be safe, I shouldn't abandon my work on the engine that runs on Unicorn Farts?
I could never be a liberal. I just don't have the capacity for blind faith.
7
posted on
03/11/2012 10:25:58 AM PDT
by
Grizzled Bear
(No More RINOS!)
To: NavVet
What else would you expect from NPR. Just like Car and Driver voting last year for the Chevy Dolt as Car of the Year.
I do miss The Car Guys since crossing NPR from my list of stations.
That is just about all I miss but I miss them just the same.
To: NavVet
Forget cars.
If you don’t see model aircraft using this soon- it’s not happening.
9
posted on
03/11/2012 10:26:22 AM PDT
by
mrsmith
(Sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party)
To: NavVet
Where is the electricity to charge those batteries going to come from?
10
posted on
03/11/2012 10:26:27 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
("The Germans: At your feet, or at your throat" - Winston Churchill)
To: vpintheak
Dirty sources like clean burning American coal and nuclear. Don’t tell me you are one of those Global warning whackos that considers carbon dioxide “dirty”.
An electric car powered by Virginia coal, is my dream vehicle.
11
posted on
03/11/2012 10:28:26 AM PDT
by
NavVet
("You Lie!")
To: NavVet
Great, he ought to work his way up through a proto-type with a private loan arranged with venture capitalists he’s convinced. He doesn’t need to jump to a billion dollar loan through well-connected Dem donors from the DOE.
12
posted on
03/11/2012 10:28:40 AM PDT
by
gusopol3
To: NavVet
Its impossible to verify all that, and Kapadia wont tell me which automakers hes working with Stopped reading right there.
To: NavVet
It ain’t going to be worth squat without resolving the recharge time issue.
Get it under 10 minutes for a full charge and they’ll be viable as an alternative to a conventional car.
Otherwise, they stay as commuters and as curios.
14
posted on
03/11/2012 10:29:25 AM PDT
by
gogogodzilla
(Live free or die!)
To: unixfox
How would this be Marxist. If it turns out to be true, and an a 25000 dollar electric car could drive 300 miles on a charge, what is “Zer0 or Marxist” about that.
15
posted on
03/11/2012 10:30:37 AM PDT
by
NavVet
("You Lie!")
To: NavVet
The bi-annual “We Improved The Battery” annoucement.
16
posted on
03/11/2012 10:31:04 AM PDT
by
Iron Munro
("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight he'll just kill you." John Steinbeck)
To: Zakeet
You obviously didn’t actually read the article.
17
posted on
03/11/2012 10:32:05 AM PDT
by
NavVet
("You Lie!")
To: NavVet
Envia says... That's all this article amounts to. If I only had a dollar for every time I've read that somebody says they have better battery.
18
posted on
03/11/2012 10:35:15 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Moonman62
Batteries are getting better, but few people realize how much better and cheaper they would need to be to come close to the power provided by internal combustion engines. Won’t happen any time soon, if ever.
19
posted on
03/11/2012 10:42:43 AM PDT
by
achilles2000
("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
To: NavVet
Doubled the energy density, while cutting costs per KW/H more than in half. If this pans out,an AFFORDABLE electric cars with a 300 mile range could be just around the corner.More likely, a Chevy Volt will have a range of 70 miles instead of 35.
20
posted on
03/11/2012 10:44:02 AM PDT
by
umgud
(No Rats, No Rino's)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson