Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

INTERESTING ANALYSIS ON UP-TO-DATED DELEGATE COUNT
Mar 10, 2012 | God-fear-republican

Posted on 03/10/2012 2:34:12 PM PST by God-fear-republican

From http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/republican_delegate_count.html

Analyzing the delegate counts for all candidates so far, I come up with the following very interesting and encouraging statistics (including Kansas today):

In the states that Newt is non-factor meaning Newt got zero delegate, Romney got 305 and Santorum got 71.

In the states that Newt got at least 1 delegate or higher, Romney got 93, Santorum and Newt combined got 204.

So you can see, with "Newt factor", Romney only get 93 or about 1/3 or 33% total delegates.

But when Newt was not in the picture for some reasons, Romney got 80% delegates.

Up to now, Romney got 437, Santorum 182, Newt 117 according to Real Clear Politics (including super-delegates and others)

The break-down of the remaining delegates are 152 winner-take-all; 58 at convention, and 1064 proportional.

Assuming Romney will win all winner-take-all and get only 1/3 of the proportional, he will pick up 507 delegates. The total Romney's delegates will be 507 + 437 = 944 delegates (excluding 58 convention delegates).

And Santorum and Newt combined will get total of 1008 delegates.

DOES ANYONE STILL WANT NEWT TO QUIT NOW?!!!

I still feel good about defeating pro-same-sex-marriage, pro-abortion, pro-Romneycare Romney!

DON'T LISTEN TO THE ENEMY CALLING NEWT TO GET OUT!

Reference: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/republican_delegate_count.html


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: delegate; gfrvanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 03/10/2012 2:34:16 PM PST by God-fear-republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: God-fear-republican
Do not assume that Gingrich voter would flip to Santorum. There's no evidence for it.

However, it IS fair to assume Santorum supporters would flip to Gingrich.

2 posted on 03/10/2012 2:37:18 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: God-fear-republican
No worries - No one’s listening - Especially Newt!!
3 posted on 03/10/2012 2:37:48 PM PST by CelesteChristi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: God-fear-republican

By “THE ENEMY”, I mean MSM and elite republicans. Santorum supporters are our friends and allies.


4 posted on 03/10/2012 2:39:16 PM PST by God-fear-republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: God-fear-republican
DON'T LISTEN TO THE ENEMY CALLING NEWT TO GET OUT!

You obviously don't want your "enemies to vote for him. Idiot.
5 posted on 03/10/2012 2:39:36 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

I hope not. I like both camps stay where they are meaning both Santorum and Newt numbers remain unchanged for my theory to work.

The point here is that when our conservative base was motivated by Newt campaigning with speeches and ideas, they came out to vote and more saw Romney negatively I guess. I might call it Newt factor or boredom factor. :-)


6 posted on 03/10/2012 2:46:21 PM PST by God-fear-republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CelesteChristi; God-fear-republican; Red Steel; Gene Eric; livius
No worries - No one’s listening - Especially Newt!!

YOU'RE RIGHT!

GO NEWT!

7 posted on 03/10/2012 2:46:35 PM PST by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Do not assume that Gingrich voter would flip to Santorum. There's no evidence for it.

If Newt quit, Ron Paul would be the only distant recourse left for me. I'm not supporting big government losers like Santorum or Romney.
8 posted on 03/10/2012 2:48:49 PM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

If one can’t make the assumption in one case, it can’t be made in the other case either. Both candidates have a similar demographic of followers.


9 posted on 03/10/2012 2:49:47 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

The enemy (MSM, elites) will never support for Newt anyway. If you talk about Santorum’s supporters, they are not my enemies (see my clarification above), they are my patriots, and I encourage them to stay their course for they don’t have to jump ship to deny Romney the nomination.

We need to go to brokered convention! Please cool your hot heads, don’t tear each other apart.


10 posted on 03/10/2012 2:51:17 PM PST by God-fear-republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: God-fear-republican
The point here is that when our conservative base was motivated by Newt campaigning with speeches and ideas, they came out to vote

In the long run, Newt would garner the broadest appeal IMO. Little Ricky can't move much beyond the biblethumper demographic, while Romney is strongest with the milquetoast moderates. If either one is the nominee, expect extremely low turnout.
11 posted on 03/10/2012 2:55:08 PM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: God-fear-republican

Lots of us have been saying it - Newt withdrawing helps Romney.

Thanks for the data showing it.


12 posted on 03/10/2012 3:02:17 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

When Newt was not a factor (getting zero delegate), the undecided voters tended to vote for Romney possibly because he targeted his only remaining opponent Santorum with his false ads or because the voters wanted to vote for the candidate who more likely to defeat Obama in the general election. You have to remember these undecided candidates they are not motivated by ideology that much.

With Newt in the ring, Romney had to divide dirty ads to both Santorum and Newt. This tactics turned off voters from Romney. And Newt helped the undecided but forgiving voters came out and vote. You see where Newt did well, the total votes counts were much higher.


13 posted on 03/10/2012 3:04:08 PM PST by God-fear-republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: God-fear-republican
But when Newt was not in the picture for some reasons, Romney got 80% delegates.

Not some reasons. Santorum is not running a strong campaign in states where Romney is strong. He is running a strong campaign in states where Newt is strong so that the anti-Romney vote is split and he gets some of it as well.

The original plan seems to have been a Romney/Santorum ticket with Santorum quitting after SC or FL, but now it is heading to a point where the establishment can pretend that Santorum is a reluctant VP candidate as a result of a brokered convention and so we must all come together and support a Romney/Santorum ticket.

14 posted on 03/10/2012 3:05:18 PM PST by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: God-fear-republican

Do you really,, honestly believe at Rick Santorum can beat Obama?


15 posted on 03/10/2012 3:09:07 PM PST by Hildy ("When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - SocratesH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: God-fear-republican

Pointless speculation - no one is getting out until they run out of money. Period.


16 posted on 03/10/2012 3:14:57 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

“Pointless speculation - no one is getting out until they run out of money. Period.”

Amen. Newt was dead last to Herman Cain, palin, Ron paul 5 months ago. As long as he can pay for the campaign, he’s in.


17 posted on 03/10/2012 3:17:19 PM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

I believe that a turnip could beat Obama.


18 posted on 03/10/2012 3:23:59 PM PST by ponygirl (Be Breitbart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

It is not pointless speculation. I would call it factual speculation. I agree with you, no one should get out.

I posted this analysis because our base appears depressed or discouraged (just read the posts before mine).

I am tired of politics, my favorite subject these days is spiritual reading or theology.

But if it is necessary, I will jump in the discussion again, but prefer not to.

Good-bye!


19 posted on 03/10/2012 3:26:50 PM PST by God-fear-republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

NO! Santorum can’t beat Obama. Newt said so and I agree with him. Newt reminds General Patton. Brilliant warfare tactician!


20 posted on 03/10/2012 3:29:58 PM PST by God-fear-republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson