Yes. The absolute applies only to the individual. When more than one person is involved, the absolute goes out the window...then we have relative or references.
I am not semantically inclined. I am talking about the absolute, universal truth that so many freepers talk of.
You have switched the meaning of “absolute” with that of “relative.”
Absolute means external, objective, never changing truth.
Relative means internal, subjective, transient assertion.
The only benefit to pretending relative truth exists in place of absolute truth is to set the stage for the purpose of lying. In an imaginary world where truth is only relative (subjective), there’s no such thing as lying.
As I pointed out to you earlier in our semantic exchange, assertions of relativism are themselves presumed to be absolute although the speaker very often doesn’t realize it.