Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: b9

I carefully explained my rationale for choosing Santorum over Gingrich and you call it bitchery? I thought I was pretty fair.


101 posted on 03/10/2012 9:24:48 AM PST by Yaelle (Santorum 2012 - we need a STEADY conservative President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: Yaelle

Of course you’d think so! You probably can’t even see how silly you sound.


103 posted on 03/10/2012 9:31:36 AM PST by b9 (Newt is substance. The others are talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

To: Yaelle

“choosing Santorum”

So you’re choosing Santorum because he has been s...g the same woman for 22 years? Some relevance.

When and of what was ever Santorum a leader? Just one senator among 100 other senators... He was trashed in his reelection bid with 41 to 59. That’s a credential?

He was one of the biggest spender of federal (taxpayers’) money in the Senate. That’s a credential?

He was one of the biggest link to lobbyists in the Senate. That’s a credential?

Give me a break.


105 posted on 03/10/2012 9:39:49 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

To: Yaelle; b9
I carefully explained my rationale for choosing Santorum over Gingrich and you call it bitchery? I thought I was pretty fair.

Yes, that's as far as your rationale can take you, so it's fair. The rest of us surpassed you.

The weak can only see/want a weak candidate - they AREN'T CAPABLE of anything more. Life's a b*tch when some choose to remain blind.

141 posted on 03/10/2012 12:23:00 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson