Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
If what Dan Nakaso said is true, then why are 3-year-olds and foreign-born children reported in the newspapers as being newborns born in Hawaii, which involves reporting the WRONG BIRTHDATE for a child? Even in the case of an adoption the HDOH would not alter the birthdate of a child, so how would this phenomenon happen from the HDOH?

When Hawaii was being considered for statehood, there was a minimum population requirement (600K, as I recall).

Hawaii fell short of that total. But, in order, to create more population they passed what was called Territorial Law #57

It authorized the DOH to accept as Hawaiian-born citizens children who were actually born elsewhere.

This law was still in effect in 1961, after Hawaii became a state.

73 posted on 03/09/2012 6:49:25 PM PST by okie01 (/i>On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: okie01

Thanks. That is very interesting. It definitely fills some missing pieces.


84 posted on 03/09/2012 10:06:21 PM PST by PA Engineer (Time to beat the swords of government tyranny into the plowshares of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson