Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AtlasStalled

Sorry, but if Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, and all Obama’s hidden history didn’t make an impression with the 53% who voted for him, him publicly promoting another loser-leftist 20 years ago certainly won’t.


5 posted on 03/08/2012 9:33:54 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PGR88

Agreed.

Obama’s acolytes either do not care about his past, or are actually IMPRESSED by his radicalism.


10 posted on 03/08/2012 9:38:13 AM PST by WayneS (Comments now include 25% more sarcasm for no additional charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: PGR88; WayneS

What we must do is think very carefully about this.

Visual links that can be seen with the naked eye are the most powerful.

In 2008, the Obama-Wright link was not visual, it was verbal.

See? (A picture is worth how many words?)


19 posted on 03/08/2012 9:46:11 AM PST by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately---reason serves faith. See W.L. Craig, R. Zacharias, Erwin Lutzer, and others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: PGR88

Of course, no one knows much about Bell. They should have warmed up by bringing in Tom Sowell to fill the public in about this fanatic Bell.


25 posted on 03/08/2012 9:56:17 AM PST by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: PGR88

“Sorry, but if Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, and all Obama’s hidden history didn’t make an impression with the 53% who voted for him, him publicly promoting another loser-leftist 20 years ago certainly won’t.”

Sadly, you are 100% correct.

Speaking of percentages, I would expect Obama to get -at least- 45-47% of the vote this time around, and that constitues only his “guaranteed starting point”. His final total may be several percentage points higher.

We’ve become a “divided nation” now. And a large minority of the population are predisposed to vote for the socialists. There’s almost nothing we can do (short of “separation”) that will change that, or persuade them to do otherwise. Even in the event of a total national collapse, they would STILL be blaming the evil capitalists and conservatives to their last breath.

What could possibly change their minds?


50 posted on 03/08/2012 10:21:47 AM PST by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: PGR88
"him publicly promoting another loser-leftist 20 years ago certainly won’t."

I agree. I was hoping for more from these tapes.

If they had Obama directly saying racial things or calling for a radical redesign of our government and constitution, then that could call highlight what he stands for and he could be forced to either defend or denounce his prior statements.

But endorsing a speaker who says these things is no different than his current affiliations.

51 posted on 03/08/2012 10:24:22 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: PGR88

In 2008 1) we had an economic crash to worry about, and McCain seemed to be abungling fool, and 2) no pubbies were exercised about this except Hannity and talk radio, because the had no way to countering the race card. So most voters never saw or heard what Wrght said.


59 posted on 03/08/2012 10:34:32 AM PST by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson