Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lakeshark

No, I am not forgetting the three legged stool at all. I am also not forgetting that while Reagan was honest and sincere about his beliefs in social conservatism, he was much more realistic about a President’s job.

You cannot separate Rick’s stool, which has two tiny legs and the doggoned social tree trunk - from his whole presentation. When you walk out with a sweater vest (and YES, optics DO MATTER) and then your family comes out and takes up the whole stage - and you make them a big issue - then you are making the social issues far greater a part of your entire image.

Reagan NEVER did that. His campaign had an entirely different feel, look, smell, essence than Santorums’ does. If Santorum was at all Reaganesque in any way, shape or form, I would likely support him.

He isn’t. I do not.


25 posted on 03/08/2012 8:11:55 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: C. Edmund Wright
Rick is not a great communicator, nor does he have the great balance in all three legs that Reagan did. He is not my favorite candidate.

Unfortunately, the candidate I support is not catching fire and has a minuscule chance of winning at this point.

There are three solutions, or we get Romney. Either we go all in for Santorum, Newt and Santorum cut a deal, or Newt pulls off some kind of miracle.

It's what we're left with, I have grave doubts that Romney is a decent alternative, he is the farthest of all three from projecting the ideals Reagan stood for.

28 posted on 03/08/2012 8:24:02 AM PST by Lakeshark (NbIttoalbl,cRwIdtaa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson