Posted on 03/07/2012 11:17:16 AM PST by jdokey
Consequences of Romney versus Obama are INDISTINGUISHABLE. Have you looked at Myth’s judicial appointment record?
If it’s Myth, I vote 3rd party.
Hank
LOVE Justified. And I miss Mags like crazy! What a fantastic character.
> I have a strange feeling that there is a LOT more coming. I think Breitbarts team is saving the best for last. This is only the tip of the iceberg.
I hope so, because what was released so far is pretty weak.
As with all the perpetrators before him, the press will continue the same old mantra...nothing here, old news...let’s just move on...because the GOP has declared war on women, poisoned the earth, denying women’ rights to free contraception, abortion pills, etc. so they can have free sex at a moment’s whim.
Man Ray
“but I will vote against Obama in November by pulling the R lever. I sincerely hope that others will do the same, simply because ANY Republican will be better (or not as disasterous as) than Soetero.
________________________
ditto”
ditto ditto
“I am white and I cant help but think that if I were Black, AA would embarrass me. Id be thinking that no matter how hard I worked, everyone would be thinking I used my skin color to get an advantage.”
Absolutely, it damages those it supposedly helps.
I overheard a conversation just this evening, two men discussing a difficult professor, and one said to the other disdainfully, “he’s probably just an affirmative action hire.”
So any “disadvantaged” person who achieves anything is assumed to be at his post due to affirmative action - not due to his qualifications.
I sure hope you're right, sandshark222.
That's exactly what I was hoping for. A bombshell.
One consolation I have kept to myself is that as much as I hate Mittens, our justified stance of his not being conservative might pan out with actual Democrats who actually want zero OUT but will more easily vote for a middle of the road R.
So, my prescription would be to DOUBLE DOWN with attacks on mitt’s liberalism, rooftop to rooftop, in a way that lures right-leaning rats and independents.
Then again the Dems probably also have damaging stuff to release in October. Forty years ago I was working on a big campaign and was told a fascinating story about two scandals that canceled each other out for Rs and Ds. One involved an illegitimate child. I forget what the other one was, but had equal potency.
So is he a Communist or a Muslim? I think it may be hard to be both.
It was on the front page of AOL.
What is this A-O-L you speak of?
That’s actually a good way of looking at it.
Isn’t that incredible!? How is it that such historical information is not out front each day? Why is it that the pubes are not plastering this all over the news every chance they get? It’s probably racist. /s
You may be right. The first volley is to suck in the media for commentary. Then follow up with a more damning piece to suck em in again. Then apply the coup de grau to put em down.
I certainly hope so...this tape was a (mostly)non-issue.
Couldn’t agree more. The “average non-political junkie voter” will not be swayed. Unfortunately, your characterization applies to most voters, I’d say. Analyzing issues, or even understanding issues, is not happening, outside forums like this. It’s still media driven, as shown by the ups and downs of our candidates. The Dems know how to win because they understand the electorate. We don’t.
Saw Hannity last night on that video. Good job.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.