In 1992, he told The New York Times that black Americans were more subjugated than at any time since slavery. And he wrote that in light of the often violent struggle that resulted from the Supreme Courts 1954 desegregation decision, Brown v. Board of Education, things might have worked out better if the court had instead ordered that both races be provided with truly equivalent schools.
He was a pioneer of critical race theory a body of legal scholarship that explored how racism is embedded in laws and legal institutions, even many of those intended to redress past injustices. His 1973 book, Race, Racism and American Law, became a staple in law schools and is now in its sixth edition.
Mr. Bell set the agenda in many ways for scholarship on race in the academy, not just the legal academy, said Lani Guinier, the first black woman hired to join Harvard Law Schools tenured faculty, in an interview on Wednesday.
At a rally while a student at Harvard Law, Barack Obama compared Professor Bell to the civil rights hero Rosa Parks.
Professor Bells core beliefs included what he called the interest convergence dilemma the idea that whites would not support efforts to improve the position of blacks unless it was in their interest. Asked how the status of blacks could be improved, he said he generally supported civil rights litigation, but cautioned that even favorable rulings would probably yield disappointing results and that it was best to be prepared for that.
Wasn’t Lani Guinier one of Bill Clinton’s very controversial appointments?
‘interest convergence dilemma’, what a profound expression and use of words. My many years of dealing with word usages tells me this is typical literary gobble-de-gook intended to lead people onto the path of ones own beliefs. The EPA has been a master of such a practice.