Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grobdriver

>>>Golisano and proponents of the movement say a popular vote would force presidential candidates to campaign in more states instead of the dozen or so swing states, such as Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida that have been key battlegrounds in recent presidential races.<<<

I can’t decide whether this guy and his supporters are fools or just plain stupid. A popular vote would mean that a candidate would just have to campaign and gather votes in a few areas of concentrated population while leaving the rest of us to rot. The guy above me who said they want mob rule is 100 percent correct.


3 posted on 03/07/2012 8:57:00 AM PST by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: redpoll
A popular vote would mean that a candidate would just have to campaign and gather votes in a few areas of concentrated population while leaving the rest of us to rot.

Rush Limbaugh points out that Romney is winning like a liberal (Population centers)

Rush: Romney is winning like a liberal (FR thread)
9 posted on 03/07/2012 9:02:17 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: redpoll

Agreed.


10 posted on 03/07/2012 9:12:07 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson