Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/06/2012 11:18:25 PM PST by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: U-238

Thanks!

I had no idea that these old aircraft were still in service!


2 posted on 03/06/2012 11:42:06 PM PST by Noob1999 (Loose Lips, Sink Ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: U-238

The Air Force wants to dump Global Hawk, which can stay on station for 24 hours, and is pilot-less, to keep using a fifty-year old airframe that requires highly specialized and trained pilot and can only stay on station half the time of the Global Hawk. Can someone tell me how this is more mission and cost effective?


6 posted on 03/07/2012 3:25:01 AM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: U-238
So pressuring the cockpit to the level of a lower altitude eliminates a lot of stressful aspects of each flight (like breathing pure oxygen).

These pilots are in spacesuits. They breathe pure oxygen to purge their bodies of nitrogen.

Even if they pump the cockpits up in pressure (not even sure the structure could handle it) the pilots would still have to be in the suit, breathing O2, in case the pressurization fails at 70K+ feet.

Or am I just using faulty logic?

9 posted on 03/08/2012 3:27:01 PM PST by hattend (Jesus wants me to make churches pay for abortions. - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson