Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: willamedwardwallace

The fact that Ohio was even this close is a win for him.

Fiddlesticks.
The fact that he hadn’t qualified in 9counties, means even if he won, he lost.
Now he’s in a lose-lose position.
Romney has just taken the lead in Ohio.


1,065 posted on 03/06/2012 8:15:14 PM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1049 | View Replies ]


To: Marguerite

Santorum did not even begin to spend the kind of money Romney did in Ohio. I would say Santorum is doing great when you look at the small amt. of money he is spending to almost trounce Romney.


1,072 posted on 03/06/2012 8:17:05 PM PST by sheikdetailfeather (Sandra Fluck is a Schmuck and Obama is her Pimp!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1065 | View Replies ]

To: Marguerite

I suppose in your mind Newt winning one state is better than Santorum winning 3 and taking a close 2nd in Ohio, right?

Surely if this is the case, you will be able to explain this in cogent terms, right?


1,074 posted on 03/06/2012 8:17:18 PM PST by willamedwardwallace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1065 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson