Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain

So in other words you could not exercise your 2nd Ammendment right without paying a $65 fee to the state every year or periodically? That sounds a lot like Massachusetts.


2 posted on 03/06/2012 7:29:28 AM PST by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MSF BU

Chicago, the cesspool from which King Barry oozed, runs the state, with an assist from dingbat downstaters who still think voting “Democrat” is a vote for Give “Em Hell Harry Truman. These folks are unabashed Socialists (at best) and Marxists (at worst). Note the mayor’s brazen effort to stick the 2nd Amendment up his rear end. He simply doesn’t care what gun rights advocates think, because he knows the Chicago machine will prevail. The very thought of having to pay a fee to exercise a constitutional right should be sufficient to have the bastard who suggested it tossed into a dungeon and nourished on wet, moldy bread for the rest of his life. Instead, it’s treated as something pedestrian and rational - the next “right step” toward Progressive utopia - where the only people with guns are the pols’ bodyguards and the feral scum of the inner cities.


3 posted on 03/06/2012 8:23:24 AM PST by Basil Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson