The question I have is, why should I have to pay for her screwing around? Could very well be that she has chosen the wrong profession and should consider getting paid for what she enjoys doing? In turn this would help to defray her expenses.
I do believe that Rush was right on target as he usually is by calling a spade a spade. Should all else fail she always could consider requesting from her Beau to use condoms what could reduce her expenses considerably. Times certainly have changed as I would have been embarrassed to death to testify and advertise my behavior at a congressional hearing and for the whole world to know that I have a hard time keeping my legs closed.
It certainly comes as no surprise to me that a liberal/socialist would come to her defense and condone her behavior along with her request for some one else to shoulder the expenses for her recreation. At the same time attacking some one who properly identified her behavior by comparing it to an age old profession.In closing I would like to state that I am certainly not a beacon of morality, but I do profess still having a few ounces of common sense at my disposal apparently more than some of the advertisers on Rush’s show.
This is is my take Saintgermaine
Absolutely nothing wrong with your analysis! It is right on!
Now the MSM would take offense though since they are only for the poor, the downtrodden, the - oh well, you know the crap.
They are always going to both protect their chosen targets and denigrate Republicans (mostly Conservatives).
While they continue with their crap, I grow more against them so maybe it all evens out. I do tend to find companies that do not knuckle under to them and others that are just simply conservative to begin with.
So, yes, you are totally right but that has no bearing in today’s world where Conservative opinion is vilified. That means that we have to do whatever we can to protest THEM.
ping