“...freedom as specified in the U.S. Constitution is not absolute, and that government policy must take a position on birth control, abortion, and private activities by consenting adults if the government deems them immoral...”
He actually SAID that? That’s something the libs should have jumped-on, but I didn’t hear about it. I’m surprised Mark Levin hasn’t brought that up yet.
No, just another paraphrased POS. Goodman is referring to Santorum's recent and past comments that freedom as specified in the U.S. Constitution is not absolute, and that government policy must take a position on birth control, abortion, and private activities by consenting adults if the government deems them immoral.
This is pure crap. You aren’t free in law to murder. You aren’t free under the law to steal. You aren’t free under the law to rape.
That’s all he said. Period.
The only people who read this to Santorum’s detriment are too stooopppppiiid to be voting. And that includes any FR Libertarians who think that freedom IS absolute.
I call abuse on this one.
Yep it is not absolute, that is why the jails are full of criminals.
Although you would not be able to tell it, it is against the law to call for the violent overthrow of the government.
You are not allowed to sell Pluronium on E-Bay will the idiocy never end.
The Seperation of Church and State is not absolute, in fact it isn’t even mentioned in the Constitution. Those silly founders broke the law when they published the first Bible for the use in public schools for the instruction of reading and morality.
So many experts, so many fools.
Santorum (I like Rick, but already voted for Newt) has a near subliminally-irritating style of speech which obscures his oratory effectiveness. (e.g., way too fast when he begins a phrase, rambling, deer-in-the-headlights demeanor, etc.,etc.).
His memorable message is unmarketable.