Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop
Whaty cute euphamism shoudl we use to sugar coat a woman with no shame and no moral values?

The term by all intent and purpose is a misogynist slur. It doesn't matter what Ms. Fluke is, Rush saw the error of his way by stooping to what the left does. Words mean things and we on the right have to promote standards which are above the left since they have none.

Wanting for taxpayers to pay so Ms Flukes can engage in promiscuous behavior may have been a better way to describe it instead of using a derogatory term directed at her.

101 posted on 03/06/2012 5:46:05 AM PST by sirchtruth (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: sirchtruth

‘Slur’? When a person makes their own bed, they can’t complain when someone calls them on it aqnd doesn’t sugar coat the issue! When a person disparages themselves and makes it public- it is NO slur to call them on it- She let the world KNOW that she is a slut- she smears herself on public television- To slur someone is to assume the person mentioning her LIFESTYLE (and yes, being a slut IS a lifestyle CHOICE) mneant malice toward that person.

If she can show the label of slut is false, and that she infact has NOT had premarital sex, then she has been slurred- if she can not show that- then she has NOT been slurred

[[Words mean things and we on the right have to promote standards which are above the left]]

We also have a responsiblity NOT to ignore such immoral behaviour!!! Should Rush have told the TRUTH and said “She is immoral, and now she wants the governemnt to support her immorality? Would that have been better? Being polite is one thing- Turnign a BLIND EYE to sin is quite another thing- it is a sin to ignore sin and to tiptoe aroudn it and pretend it isn;t such a big deal- people like Sandra are destroying htis coutnry, and the way they ARE gettign away with it is becauyse Good people will no lionger stand up and point out the sin that is being perpetrated upon this nation- Sandra and the left know that the right has lost it’s moral spine, and they are takign advantage of this fact

and by the way- you just accused Rush of hating women- have yopu evidence to back that accusation up? Pointing out hte SIN of a woman is NOT an act of hatred towards womankind- no more than pointing out hte SIN of a man would be an act of hatred against mankind


108 posted on 03/06/2012 11:43:13 AM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson