"One would infer?" Which one? Who, besides yourself, has drawn this inference? By saying "one would infer" you try to make your nonsensical assertion sound like it has weight of the crowd behind it, instead simply the benumbing quack of a solitary intellectual pifflestamp. It would have been more accurate if, instead of the words "One would infer," you had said "An idiot would infer."
If that is not the case, you willfully stated a relationship that did not exist. Therefore, one must question the existence of the firm you alluded to.
I "willfully stated" precisely what I stated. I'm not responsible for what you infer. If you wish to infer that I'm not telling the truth, you are free to do so. I would no more try to dissuade you than I would try to convince a committed believer in onanism that he's in danger of developing an embarrassing hairy palm.
I've always said there's noting more pathetic than a fool who has convinced himself he's smart. You're a pitch-perfect example of that.
If you're really bothered by what I say, why not report me to the Admin Moderator?
Using the term one indicates a single person. There was no assertion to a greater number though there may be.
I believe your personal attacks lessen any level of credence that may be lent to your original posting. Personal attacks demonstrates an inability to communicate in a rational manner and further diminish the level at which one might trust in your declaration.