Your smart ass personal attacks can carry on for as long as your wish. I am a man of unlimited patience when dealing with someone such as you. I would think by now you would have the common sense to ask permission, which is an asinine claim, to identify the firm.
Why? Why would I do that? To satisfy you? Who do you think you are? I'm supposed to call up the president of a company I haven't talked to in almost six years to get permission to do what? Tell you his name? You must think I'm as nuts as you.
Honestly, you should be under the care of a minder. You need professional help. You are trapped in fantasy-land. I don't care whether you believe me or not. If you don't believe me, fine. What does it matter?
Personally, I think you have a couple of screws loose.
One would infer from your original post that you were on a personal basis with those who head up the enterprise and chose not to mention their name out of respect for that relationship.
If that is not the case, you willfully stated a relationship that did not exist. Therefore, one must question the existence of the firm you alluded to.
Perhaps I should suggest that you don’t lie on Free Republic, if you don’t want to be found out, if in fact the firm does not exist.