LOL, you joking? I’m all for tough questions but I am just as against shilling for Obama. Do you think Wallace gave an objective view of Obama’s charitable giving before anybody was watching? Knowing the answer to that question I’ll simply move on to the next question. Why did Wallace hide the fact from the viewer that Obama and his wife wwere cheap bastards before he ran for national office and had Bill Ayers write him a book to cash in?
“Do you think Wallace gave an objective view of Obama’s charitable giving before anybody was watching?”
No. But he was interviewing Santorum. I didn’t read it as shilling for Obama.
“Why did Wallace hide the fact from the viewer that Obama and his wife wwere cheap bastards before he ran for national office and had Bill Ayers write him a book to cash in?”
You wanted him to state that in a question to Santorum? The interview was of Santorum. Again, I think he did Santorum a favor allowing him to address the difference in charitable giving, however it was analyzed. Santorum did ok.
Santorum could have addressed the difference in Obamas charitable giving - but that wouldn’t have been a good approach. He went with the right approach.