According to Fluke’s written testimony before the House, she wasn’t specifically asking for $3,000 in contraception for herself.
I think all the government mandates on insurance are a big part of the problem but also do not care for the distortions about her testimony. That is what the left routinely does.
With her background in domestic violence I am guessing she sees the Catholic church and anyone else who opposes taxpayer provided abortion and contraception as an oppressor of wymyn
Georgetown once again shows its internal rot as a “Catholic institution” that has no standards for individual conduct for its “students”
I agree that her arguments for free contraception for college age single swingers were anecdotal (BUT ABSURD) and not personal, because something about her sets off my gay-dar
Rush should have stuck to his usual “feminazi” term -
oh wait, no all of a sudden that would offend his jewish sponsors
“According to Flukes written testimony before the House, she wasnt specifically asking for $3,000 in contraception for herself.”
According to some of the initial news reports, she was. And she sure used “we” a lot if her testimony was supposed to be about “them”.
And that is exactly what they have done to Rush in this case.
Given sponsors' reactions, Rush would have been well advised to use a less harsh word, such as "promiscuous," to describe Ms. Fluke. However, "slut" is, IMHO, a perfectly accurate description of a woman with the lifestyle self-described by Fluke. Rush did not distort her "testimony."